A few words I have read to describe the proposed CIM/CalPRES
30-story tower at 3
rd & Capitol Mall… boring, gross, fugly, and not
attractive at all. I have also read positive comments but they seem to be in
the minority. I think its design is mundane which is typical with the state
influence. Thankfully these are only conceptual drawings. CIM has said that no
tenants have signed on, no price tag has been given and no permits or
entitlements have been started. This is all an effort to get free publicly, something
they have done nearly every year for the last several years but this time they
have pretty pictures.
|
Proposed tower at 301 Capitol Mall by CIM/CalPERS looking west |
Maybe this was a rushed effort to show me that there was a
proposal in response to my post about it a few weeks ago? Probably not
J Even though nothing
thus far shows this will even happen, the developer has said it could break ground
as early as 2018.
CIM plans for the site include a single 420-foot tower, 1.1
million square feet of space in the structure with 550,000 square feet of total
office space, 100 apartment on the upper most floors and creative space and
retail on the lower floors. It appears to be built to accommodate the states requirement
of large open floor plates. Several weeks ago the Board of Equalization hinted
it might relocate to this tower from its current headquarter on N Street, since
then they have said they now prefer to move to low and mid-rise buildings
instead of a tower.
|
Proposed tower at 301 Capitol Mall by CIM/CalPERS looking east |
This proposal like the Vanir Tower on J Street are still in
the very early stages of development. This proposal will now be competing for tenants
against the Vanir Tower to pre-lease. Banks under State/Federal law require
that before monies can be lent to build an office building, 50% needs to be
pre-leased. Vanir Tower needs to line up about 200,000SF and this tower needs
400,000SF. Occasionally developers will spend their own money to build high-rises
like 500 Capitol Mall did and no pre-leasing is required. The Vanir Tower has not
started the entitlement process or applied for any permits with the city. This
indicates to me that after proposing the tower 15 months ago they have not pre-leased
the minimum square footage to move forward. All these proposals emerging right
now seem eerily similar to what Sacramento experienced in 2007 before the
market collapsed and all but a few were built.
This proposal is far less appealing than I hoped for, but it
not usual when the states involved. This site is at the foot of our city's
grand entrance as you cross the Tower Bridge on Capitol Mall and deserved
something much, much more that this current trendy design which is more awkward
than anything else.
|
Current condition of the proposed CIM/CalPERS tower site |
Sources:
Sactown Magazine &
SacBee